First visit
Look for the commercial relationship
An affiliate review may earn compensation from eligible referrals and should say so clearly. Disclosure does not automatically invalidate the work, but it helps readers evaluate button placement, scoring and omitted drawbacks. A review that calls a paid relationship ‘independent’ without explaining it deserves caution.
- AVisible affiliate disclosure
- BMethod separate from commission
- CNo disguised promotion
First visit
Trace claims to current primary sources
Licence status should link to a regulator, legal statements to official authorities and bonus conditions to dated terms. Screenshots need capture dates. Generic statements copied across many brands, unexplained game counts and ‘instant withdrawal’ claims without a test basis are signals that the reviewer may not have verified the detail.
- APrimary sources
- BDated evidence
- CMethod for performance claims
First visit
Australian context is not an AUD flag
A credible Australian edition should identify its audience, state its evidence date and separate federal access rules from wagering payment rules. Local flags or AUD labels are not a substitute for sourced context and a transparent editorial method.
- AExplicit access warning
- BAccurate payment distinction
- CNo functional casino signup CTA